Political accountability is a term that refers to the regulations that various constituencies and organizations expect the public officials they support to abide by on a continuous basis. Such organizations usually have the authority to apply sanctions to politicians who fail to adhere to these guidelines. As more accountability is demanded, the price public officials must pay when they base their decisions on personal interests instead of the greater good will increase as well.
Whether or not accountability is enforced largely depends on the effectiveness of the sanctions applied by watchdog organizations or public officials' constituencies. This effectiveness can be enhanced through political competition, due to the fact that each candidate has a definite motive to expose any unethical activities in which his or her opponents participate. This frequently motivates numerous public officials to hold themselves accountable, in lieu of having another group or individual perform this task.
Throughout history, anticorruption and accountability measures were taken by groups and individuals. These measures took the form of anti-bribery bills, the latter of which were used as early as the 16th century. Often, bills of this type were the result of power struggles among various parties and political groups. Once positive results were seen following the implementation of such bills, they became popular throughout the world as a way to regulate politicians.
Such officials can also be held accountable through the expressed demands of their constituencies. Refusing to support the politician or cast one's vote for the candidate are also measures that individuals take when attempting to force a public official to act appropriately.
Almost everyone would agree that all political parties should be held to specific standards, but statistics throughout the world show that implementing effective systems to accomplish this is often difficult. A frequently heard complaint of numerous individuals concerns the way public officials spend their campaign funds. For example, many voters withdraw their support from candidates who are caught channeling such money into private interests or offering bribes for political backing.
Transparency also plays a vital role in the monitoring of public officials. There are various measures through which this can be accomplished. These include registering lobbying activities, opening government sessions and the transcripts from such meetings to the public, and making court records available to the same, including the decisions of various politicians who once worked as judges.
Other methods have been deemed effective in discouraging corrupt behavior. Examples of these include an established code of ethics, regulations on lobbying, and disciplinary committees. Additionally, asset declaration laws and party financing laws are among the most frequently used regulatory techniques.
However, to be maximally effective, any kind of political accountability regulation needs a body to implement it on a continuous basis. In the future, more organizations of this kind will likely be formed for the purpose of weeding out corrupt officials and politicians. Unfortunately, from time to time disreputable individuals will seek government positions, but the safeguards outlined above will help the public in their quest to separate the corrupt and dishonest from the genuine candidates.
Whether or not accountability is enforced largely depends on the effectiveness of the sanctions applied by watchdog organizations or public officials' constituencies. This effectiveness can be enhanced through political competition, due to the fact that each candidate has a definite motive to expose any unethical activities in which his or her opponents participate. This frequently motivates numerous public officials to hold themselves accountable, in lieu of having another group or individual perform this task.
Throughout history, anticorruption and accountability measures were taken by groups and individuals. These measures took the form of anti-bribery bills, the latter of which were used as early as the 16th century. Often, bills of this type were the result of power struggles among various parties and political groups. Once positive results were seen following the implementation of such bills, they became popular throughout the world as a way to regulate politicians.
Such officials can also be held accountable through the expressed demands of their constituencies. Refusing to support the politician or cast one's vote for the candidate are also measures that individuals take when attempting to force a public official to act appropriately.
Almost everyone would agree that all political parties should be held to specific standards, but statistics throughout the world show that implementing effective systems to accomplish this is often difficult. A frequently heard complaint of numerous individuals concerns the way public officials spend their campaign funds. For example, many voters withdraw their support from candidates who are caught channeling such money into private interests or offering bribes for political backing.
Transparency also plays a vital role in the monitoring of public officials. There are various measures through which this can be accomplished. These include registering lobbying activities, opening government sessions and the transcripts from such meetings to the public, and making court records available to the same, including the decisions of various politicians who once worked as judges.
Other methods have been deemed effective in discouraging corrupt behavior. Examples of these include an established code of ethics, regulations on lobbying, and disciplinary committees. Additionally, asset declaration laws and party financing laws are among the most frequently used regulatory techniques.
However, to be maximally effective, any kind of political accountability regulation needs a body to implement it on a continuous basis. In the future, more organizations of this kind will likely be formed for the purpose of weeding out corrupt officials and politicians. Unfortunately, from time to time disreputable individuals will seek government positions, but the safeguards outlined above will help the public in their quest to separate the corrupt and dishonest from the genuine candidates.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.freedomjusticeassociation.com for more helpful information about The Objective Of Political Accountability
No comments:
Post a Comment