Saturday, August 24, 2013

Viable Arguments Against Evolution Theories

By Tara Daniels


Theories of evolution of mankind, animals and the universe have been the basis of scientists in trying to explain as to how life came into existence. Their views have not gone down well with religious people who believe in creation by God as stated in Genesis in the bible. This group believes God created everything in six days and rested on the seventh day. For this reason, a number of arguments against evolution theories have been advanced.

The first argument is that living things come from their own. There is no way they could have developed from non living things. The general view is that there has to be a parent of opposite sex for life to come about. These theories on the other hand state otherwise and they have no proof to support their claim; just word of mouth.

Concerning the universe, there is no proof to show that it came into existence on its own. Neither could it have already been in existence before being formed. In the bible, God transformed it from the formless form into the way it is of now. Scientists perceive that it came into existence with a combination of gravitational forces which is not viable proof.

In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.

Besides, everything that is undergoing change will always move from orderly to disorderly and not the other way round. Scientists believe in the other way round. The universe is still in transition. This is basically from an orderly state to deformation with the passage of time. There is no way that the vice-verse part could have resulted into an orderly and well shaped universe as these people say so.

The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.

Cell division is another component where these scientists have based their arguments. For this to occur, a lot of time is needed since the entire process is very slow. Besides, the new bodies or cells formed are an imitation of the original matter and nothing different.

All in all, arguments against evolution theories and those in support clearly point to an existence of a party of high intelligent nature which caused all these happenings to occur and give rise to man. In Christian view, it is God who did all these work. Everything in existence is a good source of opposition to all these. Creation took place under the influence of the most high.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment