Evolution is a change that is ongoing. It is an extraordinary process that has for a long time been strongly supported by scientific establishment despite the fact that they do not have any scientific evidence. It is believed that macroevolution still takes place. This is a process where organisms change from one type to another. There is no particular proof by evolutionists that the process of evolution will, is or had taken place. Numbers of arguments against evolution have emerged.
The first argument is that there is no case for change. At no point in life has anyone witnessed change happening. Many transitional forms could have been made and observed if the process was continuous and real. On the contrary, a wide range of plants and animals is what has been observed and are of varying types among each kind. A clear gap has been noted between these types. Macroevolution is the variation among them. Often, horizontal changes are said to occur but in reality vertical change is not true.
Notifications had been made that changes did not actually take place in the past years. Evolutionists however tend to disagree with this. According to them, this process is very slow that it is almost impossible to notice it. Their major concern has been fossils to prove this. Nonetheless, the structural formula of these fossils do not show any form of change as evidence to development.
Evolution history comprises of progression of non-life to life, invertebrates to vertebrates and ape to man. The history at no point mentions the intermediaries involved. All of these have missing links in the fossil records and present world. According to researchers, the formation of nucleic acids or proteins is not possible them complementing each other with regards to origin of life. As a result, life does not originate from chemical reactions thereof.
Other evolutionists have totally committed to change. According to them, ribonucleic acid could have been the first to come. Nonetheless, it is still unclear of the rise of these acids. Hypothesis done by investigators propose that life cannot be naturalistically arisen. Scientists disapproved of this when they tried to make life in a test tube by mixing different gases. Many questions have been posed towards the progress of such.
No clue is given concerning organisms that are one celled and their evolution. It is not clear how they evolved from primordial world to the Cambrian period complex invertebrates that are vast and multi celled. This was the most puzzling and remarkable event in life history.
There is also no full explanation of creatures considered to be invertebrates in the ancient ocean. It is not clear how the fish- the first vertebrate, out of exterior parts that were hard and end up having the same hard parts on their inside. The transition of these invertebrates to be backboned fish still remains a big hysterical theory.
Man has brought many theories of change and still wants to influence others into believing them. Others come with contradictory evidences to differ with the evolutionists. They say until enough proof is given, they will continue to differ with evolutionists. Until that time is reached, many cases will be brought to bring the arguments against evolution.
The first argument is that there is no case for change. At no point in life has anyone witnessed change happening. Many transitional forms could have been made and observed if the process was continuous and real. On the contrary, a wide range of plants and animals is what has been observed and are of varying types among each kind. A clear gap has been noted between these types. Macroevolution is the variation among them. Often, horizontal changes are said to occur but in reality vertical change is not true.
Notifications had been made that changes did not actually take place in the past years. Evolutionists however tend to disagree with this. According to them, this process is very slow that it is almost impossible to notice it. Their major concern has been fossils to prove this. Nonetheless, the structural formula of these fossils do not show any form of change as evidence to development.
Evolution history comprises of progression of non-life to life, invertebrates to vertebrates and ape to man. The history at no point mentions the intermediaries involved. All of these have missing links in the fossil records and present world. According to researchers, the formation of nucleic acids or proteins is not possible them complementing each other with regards to origin of life. As a result, life does not originate from chemical reactions thereof.
Other evolutionists have totally committed to change. According to them, ribonucleic acid could have been the first to come. Nonetheless, it is still unclear of the rise of these acids. Hypothesis done by investigators propose that life cannot be naturalistically arisen. Scientists disapproved of this when they tried to make life in a test tube by mixing different gases. Many questions have been posed towards the progress of such.
No clue is given concerning organisms that are one celled and their evolution. It is not clear how they evolved from primordial world to the Cambrian period complex invertebrates that are vast and multi celled. This was the most puzzling and remarkable event in life history.
There is also no full explanation of creatures considered to be invertebrates in the ancient ocean. It is not clear how the fish- the first vertebrate, out of exterior parts that were hard and end up having the same hard parts on their inside. The transition of these invertebrates to be backboned fish still remains a big hysterical theory.
Man has brought many theories of change and still wants to influence others into believing them. Others come with contradictory evidences to differ with the evolutionists. They say until enough proof is given, they will continue to differ with evolutionists. Until that time is reached, many cases will be brought to bring the arguments against evolution.
About the Author:
You can visit the website daywithoutyesterday.net for more helpful information about Identifying With The Arguments Against Evolution
No comments:
Post a Comment