The two main parties in the US that are popularly recognized are the republican and the democratic parties. The two parties have followers who believe in the main terms the party sets. During the elections, the two parties both support their candidate to vie for the presidential seat. Campaigns are carried out to try and win the seat. They have representative in all states. Constitutional republic vs democracy helps us determine which party is better.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
A country using democratic government enjoys the stability of affairs. The citizens are all satisfied by the state of the matter and they are no intentions to change the government duties. This makes it hard to incite the public, as there is no cause for revolution. The stable nature of government leads to growth of the economy.
The democratic government style of ruling has a negative side to it. This makes it less effective in offering its services. The government emphasizes on high figures as quantity as opposed to quality. The government thus uses quantitative method of ruling. The only problem is many people do not prefer this method. This method proves why there are a high number of semi-skilled leaders in a government.
Citizens in a republican enjoy fair running of government, as the citizens are the ones who empower their leaders. There is a common welfare in running of activities as the leaders and the citizens have the same goals and objectives. There is also prosperity in economy as leaders who understand what the citizens go through represent them in a government. The leaders understand the hustles these citizens go through, as they are familiar with all the activities involved.
The law states that all individuals are under the law. Everybody is accountable for his or her choices. The constitution in such a country recognizes the human rights and freedoms. All laws aim at protecting the citizens. Sound laws are made in this state, as experts scrutinize the bill before voting it to law. The powers of the government are separated and each aspect assigned to experts to run them independently.
On the contrary, the republican method of ruling is faced by several challenges. The powerful unelected members of trade unions and members of other associations may influence a government. This leads to compromised decisions and passing of unfair laws. Opposition officials can influence the running of government by inciting the public to deny a law. Changing of any act of constitution is very difficult, as you have to consult the experts.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
A country using democratic government enjoys the stability of affairs. The citizens are all satisfied by the state of the matter and they are no intentions to change the government duties. This makes it hard to incite the public, as there is no cause for revolution. The stable nature of government leads to growth of the economy.
The democratic government style of ruling has a negative side to it. This makes it less effective in offering its services. The government emphasizes on high figures as quantity as opposed to quality. The government thus uses quantitative method of ruling. The only problem is many people do not prefer this method. This method proves why there are a high number of semi-skilled leaders in a government.
Citizens in a republican enjoy fair running of government, as the citizens are the ones who empower their leaders. There is a common welfare in running of activities as the leaders and the citizens have the same goals and objectives. There is also prosperity in economy as leaders who understand what the citizens go through represent them in a government. The leaders understand the hustles these citizens go through, as they are familiar with all the activities involved.
The law states that all individuals are under the law. Everybody is accountable for his or her choices. The constitution in such a country recognizes the human rights and freedoms. All laws aim at protecting the citizens. Sound laws are made in this state, as experts scrutinize the bill before voting it to law. The powers of the government are separated and each aspect assigned to experts to run them independently.
On the contrary, the republican method of ruling is faced by several challenges. The powerful unelected members of trade unions and members of other associations may influence a government. This leads to compromised decisions and passing of unfair laws. Opposition officials can influence the running of government by inciting the public to deny a law. Changing of any act of constitution is very difficult, as you have to consult the experts.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
About the Author:
To choose between constitutional republic vs democracy, you should first read the following blog. Get all the specifics by clicking on this link http://www.myamericamyhome.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment